awesome-repositories.com
Blog
MCP
awesome-repositories.com

Découvrez les meilleurs dépôts open-source grâce à notre recherche par IA.

ExplorerRecherches sélectionnéesAlternatives open sourceLogiciels auto-hébergésBlogPlan du site
ProjetServeur MCPÀ proposNotre méthodologiePresse
Mentions légalesConfidentialitéConditions d'utilisation
© 2026 Bringes Technology SRL·VAT RO45896025·hello@awesome-repositories.com
·

3 dépôts

Awesome GitHub RepositoriesExtraction Model Evaluation

Comparative analysis of different data extraction strategies or LLM models to determine accuracy.

Distinct from Model Comparison Interfaces: Distinct from Model Comparison Interfaces: focuses on the analytical evaluation of extraction quality specifically.

Explore 3 awesome GitHub repositories matching artificial intelligence & ml · Extraction Model Evaluation. Refine with filters or upvote what's useful.

Awesome Extraction Model Evaluation GitHub Repositories

Trouvez les meilleurs dépôts grâce à l'IA.Nous recherchons les dépôts les plus pertinents grâce à l'IA.
  • idank/explainshellAvatar de idank

    idank/explainshell

    14,084Voir sur GitHub↗

    ExplainShell is a shell command explainer and syntax analyzer that matches command line arguments to manual page documentation. It functions as a man page parser and documentation extraction tool, converting roff-formatted manual pages into a structured database of command options and metadata. The project uses a combination of large language models and roff-macro parsing to identify specific line ranges that define flags and arguments. It employs a command syntax analyzer to deconstruct shell commands into tokens, which are then mapped against documented entries to provide plain language exp

    Implements a head-to-head comparison tool to evaluate the accuracy of different data extraction models.

    Python
    Voir sur GitHub↗14,084
  • opendatalab/pdf-extract-kitAvatar de opendatalab

    opendatalab/PDF-Extract-Kit

    9,724Voir sur GitHub↗

    PDF-Extract-Kit is a document extraction toolkit designed to convert PDF documents into structured formats such as Markdown, HTML, and LaTeX. It functions as a multi-stage parsing framework that combines a document layout analyzer, a formula recognition engine, an OCR text extractor, and a table extraction system. The project focuses on recovering complex document elements by translating images of mathematical formulas and tabular structures into editable source code. It utilizes model-driven layout analysis to identify structural elements in reports and textbooks while ignoring noise like wa

    Evaluates parsing performance against comprehensive datasets to determine the most accurate extraction model for specific document types.

    Python
    Voir sur GitHub↗9,724
  • trusted-ai/adversarial-robustness-toolboxAvatar de Trusted-AI

    Trusted-AI/adversarial-robustness-toolbox

    6,056Voir sur GitHub↗

    The Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) is an open-source library that provides a unified framework for evaluating, defending, and certifying machine learning models against adversarial threats. It wraps models from any framework behind a common estimator interface, enabling composable pipelines for attack generation, defense application, robustness certification, and privacy auditing across evasion, poisoning, and extraction threats. The library distinguishes itself by covering the full adversarial ML security lifecycle within a single toolkit. It supports gradient-based adversarial example

    Tests model resilience to adversaries reconstructing a functional copy by querying it.

    Pythonadversarial-attacksadversarial-examplesadversarial-machine-learning
    Voir sur GitHub↗6,056
  1. Home
  2. Artificial Intelligence & ML
  3. Machine Learning
  4. Infrastructure
  5. Model Evaluation and Analysis
  6. Machine Learning Evaluation
  7. Model Comparison Interfaces
  8. Extraction Model Evaluation

Explorer les sous-tags

  • Model Extraction Attack EvaluationsTests a model's resilience to an adversary reconstructing a functional copy by querying it. **Distinct from Extraction Model Evaluation:** Distinct from Extraction Model Evaluation: focuses on security evaluation of model extraction attacks, not comparative analysis of data extraction strategies.
  • Model Functionality ExtractionReplicates a target model's behavior by querying it and training a substitute model on the responses. **Distinct from Extraction Model Evaluation:** Distinct from Extraction Model Evaluation: focuses on the attack technique of replicating model behavior, not evaluating extraction quality.